[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

IRCNet abuse

To: <or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: IRCNet abuse
From: "maillist" <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:39:53 +0300
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:36:30 -0400
References: <4425.65.196.226.32.1118197215.squirrel@65.196.226.32> <001201c56bff$036b3fc0$0a0aa8c0@none> <20050608153854.GA7869@dailyplanet.net>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Due constant abuse I'm forced to configure my node to reject exit traffic to
ircd ports. I'm very sorry for that, seems like some people just cant behave
when they are anonymous. That sucks a big time...

Markus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
Comment: GnuPT 2.6.2.1 by EQUIPMENTE.DE

iD8DBQFCpx9f6fSN8IKlpYoRAg5uAKCGANjb/voK+xho0gB/cprf8oDRHgCfYw9M
+nRJdmBysTrVsQSy/7yiNgE=
=XuO6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- RE: IRCNet abuse
  - From: Evert Meulie

References:
- Anonymous/Nonymous Communication Coexisting?
  - From: yancm
- Re: Anonymous/Nonymous Communication Coexisting?
  - From: maillist
- Re: Anonymous/Nonymous Communication Coexisting?
  - From: Marcel

Prev by Author: Re: Anonymous/Nonymous Communication Coexisting?
Next by Author: Re: IRCNet abuse
Previous by thread: Re: Anonymous/Nonymous Communication Coexisting?
Next by thread: RE: IRCNet abuse
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread