[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: SCTP

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SCTP
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:12:53 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:20:46 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dStpOiQ69HTFr9csZOwVxcVog73+jUYGFZJvc0eDNy4=; b=Z+483TaONoyVJioPjGaVaF9yWcYj1BPfsmJUIqspODl5Bn4dm0Zrt+S6hlR7q6vH7p QdsSqcVKrLyqjnRlq54gTWWlkRyVN+OkukcFUwuRh1DFBCL6Zwd4YT1wQRWRHtqeVd7A QxoZozHp0L0pYXLqO4OOo5TqoLCU787cRV32g=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=svZFYGA6yvr1dhoi7kWIA6/VeaeWJGFvorK4jWJ6XKWtl8dsJFXUIKg/DouU+7CP0m eQ1yojXi0xpwae1902EunwJYBxx3HCaYLOiPd2G7eoZPWE0rJWqXPBD5+BhgM0q7pLYn 2qGeIr8z2ugPXMOM6GLFaa46s3QvdyCE/b1gI=
In-reply-to: <4A268830.5070909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200906031407.n53E7nDS021083@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e692861c0906030711g2f36caa8g2b496621e89db953@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A268830.5070909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Camilo Viecco <cviecco@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would wait until it can ubiquitously work behind NATs.
> (Only FreeBSD has NAT SCTP support  and it was committed on Feb 2009).

Everyone else thinking that way is why it never will.

References:
- SCTP
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: SCTP
  - From: Gregory Maxwell
- Re: SCTP
  - From: Camilo Viecco

Prev by Author: Re: SCTP
Next by Author: Re: Firefox video tag
Previous by thread: Re: SCTP
Next by thread: Re: SCTP
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread