Re: [tor-talk] Orbot Data Overhead

[tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 20/06/12 22:13, Patrick B wrote:

> I made a blog post
> <https://guardianproject.info/2012/06/20/orbot-data-tax/> on the
> Guardian site about the data cost incurred by Orbot usage. It
> generally seems quite manageable for most use cases. Running in the
> backround 24/7 for 30 days does incur ~200MB of idle usage which
> would be significant for mobile users with smaller data plans.
> Check out the post for more details. I'm also curious if anyone has
> taken similar measurements with Tor to compare the results.

I was concerned about the idle usage of Orbot myself when I originally
installed it and took some measurements. I decided that I couldn't
leave it turned on permanently because it was sucking up too much
bandwidth. I only get 500MB/month on my phone plan. Is it going to be
possible to significantly reduce the idle bandwidth usage?

- -- 
Mike Cardwell  https://grepular.com/     http://cardwellit.com/
OpenPGP Key    35BC AF1D 3AA2 1F84 3DC3  B0CF 70A5 F512 0018 461F
XMPP OTR Key   8924 B06A 7917 AAF3 DBB1  BF1B 295C 3C78 3EF1 46B4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Uw12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk