[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Are non-official projects welcome to Stackexchange Tor Q&A forum?

Runa A. Sandvik:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I disagree with the Tor Project pushing for a StackExchange that is limited to Tor, when a StackExchange for Anonymity Technology doesn't exist as a whole. I would prefer that a SE for Anonymity software is established that includes Tor as well as other solutions such as I2P. As it stands right now, Tor looks like it's trying to monopolize any possible Anonymity SE, and that's not okay.
>> There is a thread here that echoes similar concerns:
>> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/10705/why-limit-this-to-tor
> Nadim, I said this on Twitter and I will say it here too; the right
> place for this discussion is on the Stack Exchange proposal page.

> It
> is not up to the Tor Project to decide what goes and what does not on
> this page, it is up to the community.

That contradicts what Nick initially replied (first reply in this thread).

You're totally free to disagree with what anyone else, also colleagues
said. Its a fine thing, that your employer doesn't prohibit it.

If it was up to the community, I'd feel part of that community and felt
compelled to to put a line above all Whonix pages, asking Whonix users
to support that forum. Since the essence of Nick's answer was "lets see
how things develop and revisit that question later again", I am not
doing this.

tor-talk mailing list