[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:48:33 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:48:47 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+9WYIQez/7CXxsHbPIOvnLbvGQRCzGUWe4ocCXnBt6k=; b=by0OH2SJUt52soOdUV3S6wJuAl8ITFFeGiS1lHQX6+EANtUd70ajGTbSVSkSW9iEw2 xU3HpVOZwTrfpO3QFsfUo7cYUu8k3Wldlatg3S+kLtArbHnb6IgCsAE0o9zHcvhQENAw 0dyJYM+YdzACojHbKOw5Z4GWX/+YpT2e3A5mCC88IA/ApM2U+s7Ozi14x2vF/OAJHRg9 lpRmSMW+1Iz5huyy4TpMkjzvYademVh91s9cy2dOAwZXL31LO0IZb+7d9W9Pr+WIVaFI rEwAzY+QKaqUSeab5tzPoE7Y6c0WAzOyKi31uCex+uFiDABi4t6k9iTBjmmiriRXy3xJ rkvQ==
In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1TL19Nj7SkEJPUUoZs-xpV2TmYchFwTotPjW9OOj9u-cg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD2Ti2-xVw_W2YDqkdQHmcHyKBDQjfT5jvc-8m3EAU8UkqxrUA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150618045108.GE7957@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150618115426.DE6D9E1328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAJVRA1TL19Nj7SkEJPUUoZs-xpV2TmYchFwTotPjW9OOj9u-cg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 6/18/15, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> this is where multi-path transports, which resist attacks against
> traditional in-order or stream oriented transports - inherently
> encumbered by serial datagram sequence

i should have mentioned that stochastic shaping is required along with
the multi-homed, multi-path transports. otherwise you risk carrying
covert channel in jitter forward...

that should suffice for your anonymity bibliography and mailing list
search set. :)
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
  - From: grarpamp

References:
- [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
  - From: l.m
- Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
  - From: coderman

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Invaded by disconnect.me
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka: Are TOR holes intentional?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread