[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing 1 modular exponentiation
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Removing 1 modular exponentiation
- From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:54:12 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:54:30 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=G93UFvr2enIqLMg2dWLGwU3Czgq0hMmrq2LBiEpNikR7W755NnLiJ1Y7n5PtFzJZ0+m+YwGTpps5xqeF+ShM/xs4HCdzTLLOLQAtWKEXl8Wxj7iNw1LqLdG0Mr6e8r90/wSxpRiUWZfZ9P4982oto+xklAIBL9aGBu7UvfnxKCg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=iSzPFyjac0DVreLnKxsxvNXosBJcEPCD2US3NSqqCAfOxoyCB5NezXwgXuOi3+vr9rim20nMEoFnUge2bFBRdE4+RR4dCQz5Daht/ZAM2NTelqaDkF9c3IGVphsRCG5OInT/OZZCTb7a1Zv90J9ytj9u4thYSMZfzEAag7Kq400=
- In-reply-to: <45F0E8C4.7070402@scs.carleton.ca>
- Openpgp: url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x57C89443
- References: <45D8E5F0.7050102@gmail.com> <20070219203735.GA20487@fscked.org> <45DA1948.5050206@scs.carleton.ca> <20070219230747.GC20487@fscked.org> <45DA3171.6080705@scs.carleton.ca> <20070219233017.GD20487@fscked.org> <20070219233334.GE20487@fscked.org> <45DA581B.1000005@gmail.com> <45F0E8C4.7070402@scs.carleton.ca>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207)
James Muir wrote:
> The following recent preprint deals with the subject of this thread:
>
> A. Kate, G. Zaverucha and I. Goldberg
> Pairing-Based Onion Routing pdf
> CACR 2007-08
>
> http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2007/cacr2007-08.pdf
>
> -James
>
Nice. Patents are going to be an issue for this one and we will
need a ECC library. And the distributed key-issuing thing will need to
be figured out. PBC, cited in the paper could sove issues 1 and 2.
I did find http://www.argreenhouse.com/society/wcan06/wcan06s1p2.pdf as
a solution to issue 3. Look at section 2.2. So now I have to ask the
ugly question: How do we run this concurrently with the old protocol?
Thanks,
Watson Ladd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature