[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIT Circumvention Landscape Report

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: MIT Circumvention Landscape Report
From: phobos@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:37:24 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:37:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <49B00431.6060705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <49B00431.6060705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:56:17AM -0500, basile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 1.1K bytes in 45 lines about:
: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/05/1334220&from=rss
: 
: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2009/2007_Circumvention_Landscape_Report

It's actually Harvard/Berkman, not MIT.  And Tor has a response,
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/berkman-2007-circumvention-landscape-and-progress

Thanks!

-- 
Andrew

References:
- MIT Circumvention Landscape Report
  - From: basile

Prev by Author: Re: Clock problems
Next by Author: Re: Tor memory usage on embedded systems.
Previous by thread: MIT Circumvention Landscape Report
Next by thread: Re: MIT Circumvention Landscape Report
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread