[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor documentation

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor documentation
From: Marcin Kowalczyk <marcin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:24:09 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:24:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <20100303052241.GU3407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <8CC88A810F1EB12-17A4-365D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100303052241.GU3407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Someone want to check or point me in the right direction and I will
>attempt to find out.

When you refer to some onionforum thread - why dont you read the whole
thread?

> It seems this "onion forum" thing is full of misinformation, conspiracy
> theories, and uninformed people. What a deal. :)

Kind of. There are a lot of misinformed people.
But not only. Someone posted the changelog and how to find it.
Someone else mentioned diff.

So I dont really get the point of zzzjethro666s question here.

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tor documentation
  - From: zzzjethro666

References:
- Tor documentation
  - From: zzzjethro666
- Re: Tor documentation
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: Torlock - a simple script to prevent outgoing packets from bypassing Tor.
Next by Author: Re: Full bandwidth is not used.
Previous by thread: Re: Tor documentation
Next by thread: Re: Tor documentation
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread