[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100, paulepanter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 1.6K bytes in 52 lines about:
> : I now increased the RAM too and restarted the server to no avail. It is
> : still below 100 KB/s.
> What is the network configuration?

        $ more /etc/tor/torrc
        SocksPort 0 # what port to open for local application
        ControlPort 9051
        ORPort 443
        ContactInfo 1024D/6C0E1D58 Paul Menzel <paul@xxxxxxx>
        DirPort 80 # what port to advertise for directory connections

It is a virtual machine and connections to port 80 and 443 are forwarded
by an IPtables entry in the nat table with DNAT to the virtual host. On
the virtual host using IPtables ports 80 and 443 are forwarded to 9090
and 9091.

Sebastian on IRC helped me to gather more data. In `cached-descriptors`
I have the following.

        bandwidth 5242880 10485760 155910

There are more entries for my IP address when I restarted and upgraded

In `cached-consensus` (from 12:28 UTC) there is

        r anonymisierungsdien s+wb9df31yS6Y02Rvl0i0tenAWA vyRDgH2XTP6Tn1MPiJkWE0Yk9e8 2010-03-08 18:05:07 443 80
        s Exit Fast HSDir Running Stable V2Dir Valid
        v Tor
        w Bandwidth=61
        p reject 25,119,135-139,445,563,1214,4661-4666,6346-6429,6699,6881-6999

and Bandwidth even decreased by 1 (from 62) compared to the value before
the update (11:14 UTC).

Very strange.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil