Re: [tor-talk] Current attack of TOR to break anonymity

[Miguel Regala <mikfisher64@xxxxxxxxx>]

There are some interesting papers on TOR anonymity, not really sure if all
of them have been addressed.

Some:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6407715&queryText%3Dtor
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6132443&queryText%3Dtor+cell

The cell based one is pretty fun.


2014-03-07 10:32 GMT+00:00 Maimun Rizal <maimun.rizal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Dear All,
>
> is there any attack can be break anonymity in TOR network? if so, how?
>
> I assume, if I want to break anonymity in the TOR network, I should take
> control all of relays which are used by sender and destination as a
> transmission media.
> with this assumption, It is easy to show the differences attacker
> probability in TOR network 2 relays or more relays.
>
> some papers explained that TOR network can be broke by attacker take
> control in entry and exit relays. so what differences if we use more relays
> on path-link?
>
> even there is attacker only need entry relays to break anonymity in TOR
> network. so the path-link does not affect the level of anonymity.
>
> where I can find the source explanation the kind of attacks that related
> with path-link of the TOR network?
>
> or how can we show it, with less relays on path-link will have less
> anonymity?
>
> if no differences, why TOR network use 3 TOR relays instead of 2 TOR relays
> in path-link?
>
> Thank you for advanced,
>
> Regards,
> MR
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk