Re: [tor-talk] Are webmail providers biased against Tor?

[The Doctor <drwho@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 03/17/2015 09:01 AM, Chris Patti wrote:
> They're 'biased' against Tor and other anonymizers for a very
> simple reason - people abuse them.
...
> IMO Google's response - trying to balance a desire to enable
> genuine users to use Tor while barring the bad actors, is
> commendable.

The problem appears to be quite a large one.  It would be useful to
remember that not everyone is able to speak openly about their dealing
with it for whatever reason.

- -- 
The Doctor [412/724/301/703/415] [ZS]

PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F  DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/

Remember Carcosa!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=7tdM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk