Re: [tor-talk] Invalid consensus today

[Sebastian Niehaus <sebastian.niehaus@xxxxxxxxx>]

Am 18.03.2016 um 16:59 schrieb Sebastian Hahn:
> Thus, any Tor not configured to trust
> dannenberg's new key would've rejected the consensus as signed by
> just 4 directory authorities.

Thank you very much for the explanation.

Would you recommend to manually configure dannenberg's new key (and what
would be the key word in the configuration file)?


Sebastian

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk