[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
P2P revisited.
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: P2P revisited.
- From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:23:02 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 19 May 2006 04:37:11 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-pgp-agent:x-mailer; b=mVLdmdzojQZOwk/zM+1S9n/HvIJGy6w1ue5H4lW2jk5FAePWr2A0h68CEbm8k1a0ShPfVbqXOxsa0U4gI58khLjp9QYynbFwr2fl8M7MgTIB4zwiCS/5fNmcfIz40iPp/E7QOY+pO4NNCmi5eiG2cJZOHMruwtXTqxBG9a6HliU=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If we created a P2P client using Tor that acted as an exit node we
could get a lot more users, a lot more traffic, and a lot more
capacity, all adding to the anonymity Tor provides. Any downsides?
I'm not saying Tor implement a P2P network, I'm saying we have two
clients, one just Tor, the other a P2P client built on top.
Sincerely,
Watson Ladd
- ---
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
- -- Benjamin Franklin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEbQHXGV+aWVfIlEMRAslQAKCx9UHkcn+i7c2rC8xsg0lUoMPfHgCgj5TY
F06trCjAsBgN8kbRmvc+VNc=
=DbPD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----