On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 11:33:29AM +0200, Landorin wrote: > That was totally inappropriate and since then I wonder on what > prejudices you base your judgement on... I don't want an answer to Sorry, I will not censor myself merely for the purpose of running away from controversy. Just as way back in Weimar it's time to make a stand. I see a number of decent folks think it's good to cooperate with state authorities. Them having only our best at their heart. This is a dangerous mischaracterization of their actual intentions, and I will make no apology in calling a spade a spade. > this since this isn't a flame board and shouldn't turn into one. Just > something for you to think about. You must have a very different definition of a flame than I do. > Also, if someone has a contrary position, one should talk to him in an > objective way and not the way you just did it. Otherwise don't be What is the "objective way"? I describe things as I see them. > surprised if people who believe more control leads to more security > won't even listen to you. These people won't listen, period. The only ones you can still reach are those with lingering doubts. > As said, do not respond to this, just think about it. Your points are good and valid, but not applicable. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature