[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: plausible deniability

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: plausible deniability
From: Marko Sihvo <parazite@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:43:50 +0300
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:44:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <446DC939.4060509@owca.info>
Organization: paraZite.org
References: <20060519021649.11606.qmail@web37201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060519114118.GA29998@bananasplit.info> <446DC939.4060509@owca.info>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)

Matej Kovacic wrote:

Hi,
Yes, once this is passed encrypting storage with a passphrase becomes a pointless exercise in the UK unless you are prepared to spend time at Her Majesty's pleasure in order to protect your data.
I thought plausible deniability feature of True Crypt is usable for
repressive regimes like China only.
I think I was wrong.
bye, Matej


Individual. Welcome to freedom*.

*( "crime" not included.

Society. I do not take* illegal amphetamines.

*( except on mon, tue, wed, thu, fri, sat, sun

The society pretends to offer just laws. We pretend to obey.

References:
- Did you see this?
  - From: Eric H. Jung
- Re: Did you see this?
  - From: Steve Crook
- plausible deniability
  - From: Matej Kovacic

Prev by Author: Re: cenzorship
Next by Author: (Newbie:) Why use privoxy?
Previous by thread: plausible deniability
Next by thread: RE: Did you see this?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread