[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Regulating bandwidth

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Regulating bandwidth
From: Olaf Selke <olaf.selke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:41:53 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:41:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <1bd71ad80705251247q227be4ccuda5e01f0696128d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <465723EB.3030302@xxxxxxxxxx> <20070525180639.GG6796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1bd71ad80705251247q227be4ccuda5e01f0696128d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> 
> Can we get a "CPU limit" / "Only let N incoming connections" parameter?

guten abend,

instead of spending time programming fancy features like a "CPU limit" I
suggest to focus on how to make better use of multiple cpus/cores most
modern computers are equipped with. The OR I'm running is limited by cpu
horsepower cause the main thread entirely eats up one cpu leaving three
cpus being almost idle.

regards, Olaf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regulating bandwidth
  - From: phobos

References:
- Regulating bandwidth
  - From: Andrew Del Vecchio
- Re: Regulating bandwidth
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: Regulating bandwidth
  - From: Michael_google gmail_Gersten

Prev by Author: Re: nighteffect.us gone
Next by Author: Re: Regulating bandwidth
Previous by thread: Re: Regulating bandwidth
Next by thread: Re: Regulating bandwidth
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread