Re: Reregister after key change?

[Robert W Capps II <robert@xxxxxxxx>]

Based on a thread from last October, I don't believe they are  
registering 'named' nodes anymore.

I think the loss of the 'named' status is the worst part of the key re- 
gen process - for those of us that run legacy, named nodes.

Now, time to roll keys on my nodes . . . .

Robert


On May 15, 2008, at 7:13 PM, F. Fox wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> tor@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> (snip)
> > Anyway, since I changed my onion key because of the ssl vulnerability
> > should I send another email somewhere?
> (snip)
>
> I did.
>
> It's tor-ops@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx , I believe.
>
> - --
> F. Fox
> AAS, CompTIA A+/Network+/Security+
> Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
> http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQIVAwUBSCzt4Oj8TXmm2ggwAQhh5RAAwFt2pwwiu9FUrZnQ/Iv5SMyJzDZWAZmd
> lSK2r46i4TkN3sHpa6rTtbBONR5ai1e70RBkZdWDOTaKKtqjkXaxF9aSjgDAzYd/
> xEnyX8zAqYbwb05E5uvjQN+/P9S2jX4sls4GjOoTGuX7kT8cUgayCJowgp4EdmO5
> fCPCUNuOUVKTUdjXx9xE7lz93isGlXl+bfyaITa6xs5aLAq0Zq2GAZwrKzi50jpn
> 3iYCwQC70U7ZQmh6M5k6OKs4VCtdVbTuPsoUf6zC+l8OuQnkiYcI2eXJIv5ePLcw
> 4r9+XGF3z8Vs+kYJyGplwGvYlp+on682Vci12RfKpqzMFByX3n3s1lKDpVJcmsbC
> I/xdK07SWuAuwmmJkxtew07SaODAqZFOxHsHc+6qKD8Pd2Q31SsC/49zBMh/MaZI
> zZ8tcmPxe21r6IoHHlatyC4iT0PKEKjsXP8t4AKjP61C/EH39eZNezd86fWDg7bU
> eM19vbKuG9MlfweZwiREA7Tn54Jp18Xrg7NPIbn/cjaeB4hMx6sNM4cHRF8Njr1A
> cdmqi9MzAA9YxoW8OwIHpuUA6At19i5VOI4Fb4lU/JqNAAA9hm+gAARjjqojI1Dc
> +Df5Z96AvMuv/PCCnpEH2l6eBkMhOHSklef+M6ercYiRXBHEAlkqXhq6hkTH33MV
> 8dpQdZb+rz4=
> =u+WU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----