[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: why is the traffic not more linear?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: why is the traffic not more linear?
- From: DC <newswiki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:35:50 +0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 May 2010 04:36:01 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ROTyYe7OcHr6Y6gCnCWKR/kFfTwUEqU1rAkZcYApreM=; b=a8jUZH74Eh86DNFFojo5LjcIWrqiGW4iBx/fM4HpdjvUfrYpH67StpUnF/LrsqXaZw z3Knax4KTnpKQoy7sJ/GKQwDPZWH3pk5bZ/Bjm+Tbi+mH9guRVPhJPYAtL65rV9baCJe 4Tpjf4Y4mmN/9ZeefUUNkQ5dOoXYBlcP2uKfk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eeMBvNzyv8Obj4dLs/ZxPBrDRXj6s1vxZ+qxABY8Hu8ndPecbholMA/wgG40zjuNH5 Osijf0jHwiHoIjHsABv75sVlUlCJHGqxgRAFML9Sqmm41wIq5y37MYK7+ZayZ8oc3gvF AaG8L0BAxJxZMSCK9OJlgtjTlLyfZJj16wk0k=
- In-reply-to: <201005140720.o4E7KwDB020323@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <201005140720.o4E7KwDB020323@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
for me it seems the graph is fine. though the node so seldom hits
beyond 80000bps
before i experienced a flat line for several days. i didn't go below
my max speed for several days. a literal flat line to the max for
about 2-3 days.
On 5/14/10, Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010 01:04:11 -0400 andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:22:49AM -0400, michael.gomboc@xxxxxxxxx wrote
>> 1.6K bytes in 47 lines about:
>>: significant parts of my torrc:
>>:
>>: RelayBandwidthRate 100 KBytes # Throttle traffic to 100KB/s (800Kbps)
>>: RelayBandwidthBurst 200 KBytes # But allow bursts up to 200KB/s
>> (1600Kbps)
>>:
>>: AccountingStart day 00:00
>>: AccountingMax 10 GB
>>
>>You told Tor to only do 10GB of transit a day. I suspect your relay
>>spends lots of the day hibernating waiting for the next accounting
>>period to start.
>>
> Unfortunately for that argument, 100 KB/s * 86400 s/d = ~ 8.24 GB.
> Given that a relay typically averages about half the target limit, my take
> on this is that we don't have enough information to determine why he sees
> what he does. He really didn't tell us what sort of variability he see
> anyway. Does he mean that it is erratic on a minute-to-minute basis? Or
> at various times of day? The graphs at the link he gave appeared damaged
> in Firefox, appearing as straight, horizontal lines (yes, plural) in and
> below the graph boundaries.
>
>
> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
> **********************************************************************
> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
> * -- a standing army." *
> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
> **********************************************************************
> ***********************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
>
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/