[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
From: David dela Rosa <gary02121993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 01:02:08 +0300
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 May 2015 18:12:10 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent :from:from:date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t= 1432332131; bh=QZrH/5d7o2tTJCo8cS08dgLU5RiZjy3vX0NQOqPyLHU=; b=K yQkoYN3AFAr3QEzIaFBjZvuz6vJpRc7HfGoWWKjoD3YlwQAfhzegkvb3whFjAzTc 7l8tePsDkAFSmrGf+FpH7GVZUgqtcK3E8oHibqZQkn5eZVSwNQRtLnbSoVli9Hm6 PPqbjr/cu9wlPbFLb2xTjCG78SdL99NyHJaKbs2ViY=
In-reply-to: <CAMTdTS8v6JTLvgf3ZaVOtp-FLdpcHK+BkVEEHSw-XZk3nYwR4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <555F9ACE.4020707@xxxxxxxxx> <CAMTdTS8v6JTLvgf3ZaVOtp-FLdpcHK+BkVEEHSw-XZk3nYwR4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0

I don't get anything from the link. Nothing shows.

On 05/23/2015 12:23 AM, benjamin barber wrote:

Here is a link to the paper. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.05173.pdf  however I
dont think there was any source released.

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Yuri <yuri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This story
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/tor-astoria-timing-attack-client/ has
been injected into all possible news streams today.

Is there any merit to it?

Yuri
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
  - From: gary02121993

References:
- [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
  - From: Yuri
- Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
  - From: benjamin barber

Prev by Author: [tor-talk] (no subject)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] 100-Foot Overview on Tor
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread