[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor
NOTE, if you want newbies (and occasionally potential contributors) to
not be really frustrated with your communciation, perhaps define your
key terms on first use.
Since "AS" has not been defined anywhere in this thread (yet), I
downloaded the paper (OK, that might be a reasonable desire - get
people to download and read the original source, but still ...
please!), only to find the term "AS" used nearly half a dozen times
before it's ever defined/unpacked in the paper itself!
PS: For those who were wondering: AS ~= autonomous system.
On 5/24/15, Rishab Nithyanand <rishabn.uci@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to stress that most of the news articles I've come across have
> some incorrect claims. It is sad that none of them got in touch with us
> before publishing their stories. Please read the paper  if you'd like to
> know what Astoria actually tries to do.
> We'd rather have informed positive or negative feedback from interested
> people, than uninformed approval or dismissal of our work. In the end, our
> goal is to build something useful for the Tor community.
>  http://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.05173.pdf
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to