[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:50:28 -0400
Cc: cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx, "cryptography@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptography@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:50:43 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DXon+EuryIE3tJDW+6Mld9jmZhXkD1NHD7EDjk8XKM4=; b=OYuc1WCu1W4aut68ewTjtYnxJMMnW84aAdvIfLa1u5jR0wgrG6PJm2x/n9OooVRw18 uRAvuvI0DSb5wCGuL2wke0PckKnMBdGaGZclE6Y6JUTuAeoxvwXRyvBEvpsWu0vhNO8C yEL1EV8m/VfQePqzlP4EUgzDiYCvRdI+iki8+he/6mLhg94YhXEEl/0whnz9SMZ1yBl6 Il2TlB7cw5hPKtVFiBiHHtHxkV/chNVWSy/JnEJQuXduHjY/L9F8km60ARIhHduM694O O3mvb1uTr8SgKT3f+2yyfd2ak5U12HxguzPdZqq7z1XxcfxlKhkkL/Zpbp1mqiF+5/tU pnHQ==
In-reply-to: <CAOsGNSRyU5eYefsw7QQZ4srJBZAwq+cPA-HLy0D1R=43vDJsoQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAMm+Lwg5K2VudO_c3s=P0G0_MCN3aCOeuZ_FAaKRTYLKMzaVvA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti28xG7j6DzULAJNqdEVE30HLktO_MC8w0vRGOH4uUODz5w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAOsGNSRyU5eYefsw7QQZ4srJBZAwq+cPA-HLy0D1R=43vDJsoQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/28/15, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
>> No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense.
>
> I thought that was the main differentiator for I2P (as compared with TOR)??

Nope. As above.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
  - From: Zenaan Harkness

References:
- Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
  - From: Zenaan Harkness

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Hola.org routes his vpn traffic over customers like tor
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread