[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage
On 2/7/16, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Tom A. <thomasasta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or
> Fine example of the classic passive shilling for GoldBug / BitMail, etc.
>> I agree that all closed source crypto is obsolete.
> Yeah, so is all the non-reproducible binaries of opensource code
> above, deleting critiques off your own forums, etc... ahem.
There's a theory that the stupider someone is, the less it costs to
buy their corruption.
>>> Also, since Tom spammed a link to BitMail, it's worth noting that
>>> BitMail appears to be developed by the same people who made GoldBug.
>>> For those of you keeping score at home, GoldBug falsely claimed to be
>>> a project of EFF and CCC. It would be wise to assume that BitMail is
>>> malware or backdoored unless proven otherwise.
> Tom's long been associated with their little game.
> Search the whole scam out on tor-talk, cpunks, google, etc.
> Till y'all step up to the plate... hasta Asta.
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to