[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Post Quantum Tor
>> was just looking at BGP routing over tor. I'm not sure how to do that with
>> the current implementation over hidden service. I'm having a hard time
>> working out how to use it as layer 2 and encapsulate things over the
>> network from one hidden service to another.
> This is because Tor only provides proxying and exit services at the
> transit layer. You can't route arbitrary IP packets over Tor, and
> so you can't, for example, ping or traceroute over Tor.
> Hidden services, for their part, don't even identify destinations with
> IP addresses, so there's no prospect of using IP routing protocols to
> describe routes to them.
There are ways to do that...
Yes if you changed the /48, played with NAT, and/or added router services...
you could also interface onions end to end with clearnet and things
like CJDNS / Hyperboria if you wanted to.
> There have been projects to try to make a router that would automatically
> proxy all TCP traffic to send it through Tor by default.
Packet filters, tails, whonix, tor-ramdisk, etc do essentially this
all the time.
> that they were supposed to remove linkable identifiers and behaviors.
> send cookies from non-Tor sessions
> continue to be highly fingerprintable.
Then don't do those things.
They're user issues, not issues of whatever anonymous overlay.
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to