[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20090101

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 20090101
From: Peter Kornherr <ibis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:13:46 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:13:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <20071109145944.GH4005@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20071109145944.GH4005@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:59:44PM CET, you (Eugen Leitl) wrote:

> This will be contested as unconstitutional, but in cases it
> will become law all Tor operators are required by law to start 
> logging 20090101.

20080101 :(

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 20090101
  - From: Eugen Leitl

References:
- 20090101
  - From: Eugen Leitl

Prev by Author: Re: Another host in China which use persistant cookie to track Tor users
Next by Author: Re: 0.1.2.18 Crash on Mac 10.3
Previous by thread: 20090101
Next by thread: Re: 20090101
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread