[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
From: slush <slush@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:33:27 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:33:33 -0500
In-reply-to: <20081109232320.GX6497@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cbb8f04c0811091340wdf6c67n4f6084e620988a0a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081109214404.GW6497@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bd9056300811091515o6e1b4aa4j2cebb908f77f5a28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081109232320.GX6497@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Doesn't matter for me, if Tor fails under Windows because Im using mainstream :-). I will try it for week on my home server before running on production.

Thanks,
Marek

2008/11/10 Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>

Tor 0.2.0.x is somewhat more stable than 0.2.1.x-alpha in general. For
example, we just made a change in 0.2.1.7-alpha that will make Tor
mysteriously fail to start on some obscure operating systems.

References:
- Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
  - From: Matt LaPlante
- Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
  - From: slush
- Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
Next by Author: Re: Introducing Torsocks - Transparent socks for Tor
Previous by thread: Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
Next by thread: Re: Kudos on memory usage in 0.2.X
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread