[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?
From: Olaf Selke <olaf.selke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:11:51 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:11:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <1290652703.4798.1407079537@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1290652703.4798.1407079537@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6

Am 25.11.2010 03:38, schrieb Theodore Bagwell:

> ** I speak primarily of "torserversNet_" numbers 1-5, and PPrivCom___"
> numbers 004-052.

hi there,

would you mind to broaden your research covering blutmagie1-4? Its last
24h sustained bandwidth is higher than the cumulated bandwidth of all
torserversNet and PPrivCom relays.

Currently about 25% of all traffic reported by relays flagged as exit is
routed thru blutmagie (50090 KBytes/s of 191341 KBytes/s Tor network's
total). This doesn't trouble you?

Olaf
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- Active Attacks - Already in Progress?
  - From: Theodore Bagwell

Prev by Author: Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?
Next by Author: Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?
Previous by thread: Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?
Next by thread: Come here! When you want to go shopping,Very cheap
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread