[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] [liberationtech] BitMail.sf.net v 0.6 - Secure Encrypting Email Client
- To: liberationtech <liberationtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [liberationtech] BitMail.sf.net v 0.6 - Secure Encrypting Email Client
- From: adrelanos <adrelanos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 00:38:34 +0000
- Cc: cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx, gnupg-users@xxxxxxxxx, liberationtech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dev-apps-thunderbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx, Ulex Europae <europus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:41:12 -0500
- In-reply-to: <52860a15.43e3440a.4abd.ffffe2e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
- List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
- List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <ae8cd640b1fa2bcc727a1ee67ca9ed02.cm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti2-vc1uw=Fz_ho1r58m05=cF=ggox5d848jh5XBiPDuNaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52860a15.43e3440a.4abd.ffffe2e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am not in contact with bitmail in any way, I wouldn't use it myself
because I find the communication about bitmail very poor, namely no
responses to points raised by others. Anyway, I like to comment on a few
things raised here.
Ulex Europae:
> Robert'
> should upload his binaries to Github.
No one can host binaries on github at the moment. They deprecated that
service.
> Along with his source code. Then,
> if the MD5 checksum on his compiled binaries matches the MD5 checksum
> on the source code when it is compiled independently, he's golden.
Sure.
> That
> is how that works, how it is supposed to work.
This should be our ideal, but we're far from it, very few software
packages support this.
> Accept no substitutes.
I don't think that's possible at the moment. There are no
deterministically built operating systems yet.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk