[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden Services v2 proposal (nickm)

To: "tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Hidden Services v2 proposal (nickm)
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:01:54 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:02:07 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=5t4nehL1cwLssz1SLw2vOYwo8i0OYxXQIIqfXHxdw6k=; b=czAXLEE2rj38GfvaNVZYO11J32Qgdt735bAUUHCm65sUmv6gxASY46LLjYG09PI00z UGaZOnf52bPYwJewFnwTUH2OTZ5Hyu9bJbONRh4Z26mnnT83GKuxENdGlfYBEscRxhtL VuR+czortvms5dTOmkn+Iw2D/uJCMm5yv1lLKvqESMdQFzt0w3AVRTWdf1ElfDziaDZL 9U4jRzQzYuHrs1FnnXnd6isFCExlWdKfJo35jt8aXAHuDxtLLKqW8EpNWEhwEHgc/hOB dgkqLGINShA10DtyCLks7DfxY54Zh95WQNcs+gth3Rq1ivRajrxB1A83Bx9jeUMkxUyO dVqw==
In-reply-to: <aaee8cc1ccb80896fd1615b84844e142.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <aaee8cc1ccb80896fd1615b84844e142.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:01 AM,
<BM-2cUqBqHFVDHuY34ZcpL3PNgkpLUEEer8ev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the record, regarding the new proposal to have ecc keys and longer
> names (unhashed) as hidden service hostnames as opposite to SHA1, what
> other changes will this proposal make to the hidden services arhitecture?
>
> In particular I am interested if this kind of attack will be cancelled:
> http://donncha.is/2013/05/trawling-tor-hidden-services/
>
> It's quite important for reliability and scalability. Thanks.

The proposal is right here -- anybody can read it:
    https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt

The attack you mention should be ameliorated by the directory system
changes of section 2.

-- 
Nick
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- [tor-talk] Hidden Services v2 proposal (nickm)
  - From: BM-2cUqBqHFVDHuY34ZcpL3PNgkpLUEEer8ev

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] ChatSecure Problem?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"
Previous by thread: [tor-talk] Hidden Services v2 proposal (nickm)
Next by thread: [tor-talk] Darknet Sites Shutdown
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread