[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Blog: "Thoughts and Concerns about Operation Onymous"

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Blog: "Thoughts and Concerns about Operation Onymous"
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 17:49:19 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 17:49:31 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=21Gg3amDfn8QM2y3WfrzLXg9VCphskNY4z+qy1c2LZ8=; b=Dj/NLX5sQHcdATkhbIMRmNh0TdgehhH3aJol7YMvps45WWLttjJXfXF0DBND89XOw3 6M7c2rw9SIUrqV2OhqD9Jr51OBH3l8i0xAxEWeyQTdrPl2vuQYYMZ4cbM0PAZmzg6H/f OcwSb2crG78zJ7OwIgy5EEWmEKXcAaBrnFZAtf8g0QdCBjX8DuWV/viXb+cMQCNDQQ3F VNXlI39EtmUqWVP+U30CeX0OnRZEueV1OI8GrTQeOGFwPNFxLZsqfTd6RL/W8A6CKuO7 W47DzqB7TvPMaQW6IrJZdKQtfwxnwMGINQOTawNeicS4lJi3R1IraGairXEdKlgSH3zk gmSw==
In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1SiV81+=X6U21merRjxE58L4SxR-LOb=xjY-G0EFN5U2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAJVRA1SiV81+=X6U21merRjxE58L4SxR-LOb=xjY-G0EFN5U2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 11:48 AM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Op:
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/thoughts-and-concerns-about-operation-onymous

Bitcoin deanonymization
Ivan Pustogarov et al. have recently been conducting interesting
research on Bitcoin anonymity.
Apparently, there are ways to link transactions and deanonymize
Bitcoin clients even if they use Tor. Maybe the seized hidden services
were running Bitcoin clients themselves and were victims of similar
attacks.
https://crypto.stanford.edu/seclab/sem-14-15/pustogarov.html
Time and Place: Friday, November 7, 3:30pm. Gates 463A

Slides from the above presentation have been teased out and
are now available below.

https://crypto.stanford.edu/seclab/sem-14-15/stanford-2014.svg
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor Blog: "Thoughts and Concerns about Operation Onymous"
  - From: Derric Atzrott

References:
- [tor-talk] Tor Blog: "Thoughts and Concerns about Operation Onymous"
  - From: coderman

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Darknets/science vs. GPA/LEA/Law, and playing dirty pool
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] anonabox : the Tor hardware router
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Blog: "Thoughts and Concerns about Operation Onymous"
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Blog: "Thoughts and Concerns about Operation Onymous"
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread