[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router



On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:39:06 +0000, hellekin wrote:
...
> But now I think it would be better to explain why it's not necessary,

You need it if you want to guard against the user device accidentally
routing around the box? Also, auto-config of the clients without hassling
with the upstream DHCP.

> Given a NIC with Gigabit capacity, is there an actual use-case where 2
> NICs are required instead of one?

No need for a switch for a single user device.

I'm not even completely comfortable with having only one port
on my router and accessing the DSL modem via VLAN and the switch.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk