Sean, This is true. Perhaps the kind lawyers at EFF would like to write an example response for ISPs to send to copyright owners -- after all, it may be construed as rather silly that we have customers telling ISPs that Tor is OK without telling the ISPs how they should respond to the threats. Geoff On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Sean wrote: > I may be missing something, but the response template > appears to be directed to an ISP, not a copyright > owner. But, I read the letter as coming from a > copyright owner. Thus, the template would not be > appropriate. > > I reserve the right to be incorrect... :) > > > --- Geoffrey Goodell <goodell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Have you read the Tor Legal FAQ, linked from the > > main Tor page under > > "FAQs"? > > > > http://tor.eff.org/eff/tor-legal-faq.html > > > > You will notice a standard response template: > > > > http://tor.eff.org/eff/tor-dmca-response.html > > > > Geoff > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:41:39AM -0400, Marc Abel > > wrote: > > > Presumably, all Tor exit node operators will be > > receiving such letters > > > eventually? > > > > > > I don't remember seeing this scenario in the Tor > > FAQ. Does anyone have > > > an idea what action, if any, should be taken when > > I get mine? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > ----- Bob, the monfster@xxxxxxxxx, saith ----- > > > "Well, that explains the DCMA letter I got via Cox > > on October 4th. ..." > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Music Unlimited > Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature