[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
From: "Marco Bonetti" <marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:53:30 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:51:20 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20071003082944.GA19041@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46F8572C.8020500@xxxxxxxx> <20070925042428.GA15313@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46F97E11.9050709@xxxxxxxx> <20070926004151.GA13336@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16085.81.208.60.192.1190788478.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071003082944.GA19041@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5

On Wed, October 3, 2007 10:29, Mike Perry wrote:
> Actually, my iptables manpage only says that pid, sid and command
> matching are broken on SMP.  Perhaps UID is actually safe?
yup you're right, also http://linux.die.net/man/8/iptables said so.
I probably misread ubuntu page :)
I'll remove the warning this evening, thanks for pointing out!

ciao

-- 
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://www.slackintosh.org
Linux-live for powerpc: http://www.slackintosh.org/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live
My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org

My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
  - From: Marco Bonetti

References:
- Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
  - From: Mike Perry

Prev by Author: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
Next by Author: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
Previous by thread: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
Next by thread: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread