Hello TOR people, Yay! I did finally get server up, but all is not
completely good: Anyone interested please note log entries.Thanks for advice
and support.
I hope to have it working perfectly soon. Am not sure exactly what to think
of entries below:
*****************************************
Oct 29 03:31:32.969 [Notice] Tor v0.2.0.7-alpha (r11572). This is
experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on
Linux i686)
Oct 29 03:31:32.975 [Notice] Initialized libevent version 1.1a using method
epoll. Good.
Oct 29 03:31:32.979 [Notice] Opening OR listener on 0.0.0.0:9001
Oct 29 03:31:33.131 [Notice] Opening Directory listener on 0.0.0.0:9030
Oct 29 03:31:33.138 [Notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050
Oct 29 03:31:33.142 [Notice] Opening Control listener on 127.0.0.1:9051
Oct 29 03:31:46.978 [Notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks
like client functionality is working.
Oct 29 03:32:19.088 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is
reachable from the outside. Excellent.
Oct 29 03:32:45.443 [Notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
Oct 29 03:33:41.789 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed
Oct 29 03:33:41.872 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up
Oct 29 03:33:46.790 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed
Oct 29 03:33:46.856 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up
************************************************
I can see from the Bandwith Graph that some traffic does flow through,
though not a lot. Is this normal? Is it OK that I get a "nameserver" error
and how can that problem be solved?? The listed back up is my normal DNS at
comcast.
Algenon
algenon flower <algenon_flower@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Pei Hanru, experienced TOR users
I have checked Linksys doc's and I think they were helpful. At present, I
think I need to assign a static IP to my RHEL system behind NAT firewall.
That seems to include two extra assigned IP numbers, like 196.168.1.20, Then
I can use port forwarding set-up on NAT router. I bet this is elementary
school for many of you, it took a little while for me :),, All I need now
is the procedure to assign a static IP on RHEL. I am checking that now,,
And, Hope it all Works! In any case, thanks to people interested, and
additional comments welcome.
peace, Algenon
Pei Hanru <peihanru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2007-10-27 06:23 CST, algenon flower wrote:
Hello Michael Holstein and other interested people
I thought I had accomplished port forwarding (see attached file) but
did not succeed. After checking with Linksys support site I am going to
try a new apporach. Will study the doc's from Linksys, if anyone has
experience with this please let me know.
Algenon
Unfortunately, you are doing worse...
What you should do is first figuring out the *actual* private IP address
of your Linux box, then forwarding port 9001 and port 9030 (or port
range 9001-9030 if you like) to *that* address, rather than forwarding
the same port range to three distinct addresses.
It's a good idea to reread port forwarding part of Linksys manual carefully.
Hanru
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHJDrrtHG285r2MGoRAvAJAKDLRHZYc/5ZRXeNgaIXnZHUr/2zXgCeOqji
h67261xOLOYdjvEyADPndks=
=EmPN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com