On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:54 -0700, Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake Eugen Leitl (eugen@xxxxxxxxx): > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:44:59PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote: > > > Thus spake Eugen Leitl (eugen@xxxxxxxxx): > > > > > > > https://www.privacy-cd.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=66&Itemid=89 > > > > > > https://www.privacy-cd.org/en/no-network > > > > > > I suppose that's one way to address the problem of the network > > > adversary... Sure looks like this means this post has nothing to do > > > with Tor, though. > > > > Yes, it doesn't have to do with Tor directly, should have > > pointed that out. However, there's at least some overlap > > between Tor users and higher paranoia-level folks, and the > > environment is complementary to Tor in that regard. > > There may be some overlap, but all of those people are doing it wrong. > You can't really say that they're doing it wrong. They're just doing it right to the point of not really doing much of anything. Security is all about a balance of doing it wrong versus doing it right in a way that allows you to do stuff. Apparently, UPR's users can do stuff, or at least I assume they can if they use UPR.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part