On 31/10/11 10:17, Roger Dingledine wrote: > https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/ideas/xxx-encrypted-services.txt > which could use some more work but might do what you have in mind. > > There's a possible second-order effect here since both encrypted > services and hidden services will have foo.onion addresses and it's > not clear based on the address whether the service will be hidden -- > if *some* .onion addresses are easy to track down, are we encouraging > adversaries to attack all rendezvous points just in case? Give encrypted services a .leek address instead, to highlight that they might be leaky (gerrit?) ;-) Julian -- 3072D/D2DE707D Julian Yon (2011 General Use) <pgp.2011@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk