[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] "Little Snitch" for tor!
Fabio,
You hit it! Finally I am happy to read agreement. Maybe a campaign should start? Little Snitch and Hands Off developers: I will switch to your product if support for socks diversion comes!
PS Hands Off has filesystem control for apps, I think
--
Jerzy Åogiewa -- jerzyma@xxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 6, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> Hi Agree,
>
> there is generally a serious lacks of high usable applications for
> application sandboxing from both filesystem and network operations point
> of view.
>
> I hate advertising a commercial product, but Handsoff is a very good
> example of highly usable/security application for Mac.
>
> If they would add a "Divert to Socks" = "Anonymize" option, it would
> make the stuff you're asking for.
>
> In general i think that the world lacks a free software for Windows or
> Linux or Mac OS X that allow the end-user to create it's own "Sandbox
> profile" for it's "Applications and operating environment".
>
> That's a major issue, especially for Linux users where, as far as i
> know, there's not even a commercial alternative providing the right
> balance between Security and Usability in handling sandboxing.
>
> As a result most Linux user i know run a most unsecure environment
> respect to Client Side attack surface than most Mac OS X and Windows
> user i know that instead use Application Protection suites for sandbox
> their clients application.
>
> That is the real problem!
>
> -naif
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk