[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Silk Road taken down by FBI

No, it was a rookie fuck-up that enabled old-fashioned detective work. if
it wasn't a fookie fuck-up, then none of this would have happened.


On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Gordon Morehouse <gordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Jonathan D. Proulx:
> > 2) Traditional police work still works - this should be good news
> > to the law and order folks that traditional methods still work and
> > no extensive digital survailance state is needed.
> >
> > Note I'm only anecdotally familiar with Silk Road so no personal
> > opinion on wether he should be praised or flogged, I do think in a
> >  "dear legislator please don't ban privacy" kindof way point 2 is
> > important.
>
> A trillion times, this.
>
> I knew Silk Road would very likely get busted by good old fashioned
> police work.  It was too big to not leave trails that smart, patient,
> Bill-of-Rights-respecting (though that remains to be seen) cops can
> pick up.
>
> Best,
> - -Gordon M.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSTYooAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujQtAH/12pYj8D+hdrt2+zbNBCVyVl
> nzKzevXwC8UGqFPz5K2xCGjVD5Dg979IxQAFGLrjv7wp+X+zF15HnHtQEquZHOtI
> vSgh8KPB92zajP2/k4agLGCrKNPbZSpQehYSu7H73ZzcFjyS/T2EOLm+ri23R/0z
> czM8bZ53uaB/qwIEPM91b0OjggiYR01NjpZmQTjM3O5LYH25bpwd3ue7mkqGIxj0
> LFZo4b/QTnNS6ZA0ZR8dHpk3cYuF70XTr5z2UZUow7577FsBDbwC5IATorQap1fb
> nqrPWshwgysnVUxspU1jwHinW+2zkISSZG0C6L8K8PQ9lq/td5AsocErFo/3+Fg=
> =EdOP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk