[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Bitcoin over Tor isn’t a good idea (Alex Biryukov / Ivan Pustogarov story)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Here are some Bitcoin reliable nodes sponsored by Thomas (TheCthulhu)
accessible via Tor hidden services:
All use Bitcoin default port 8333. These servers are up all the time
and very fast.
Hidden services are end-to-end encrypted so the risk of MITM between
nodes does not exist. Also, if you run bitcoin in such a way with
onlynet=tor enabled in config, nobody listening your wire can have a
slight clue that you use bitcoin.
We think tor-hidden-services only Bitcoin nodes are a very important
part of the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Getting them running is quite simple. You just need disk space, at
least 50GB free for now. Here are some guides:
On 10/27/2014 10:03 PM, Thomas White wrote:
> I didn't realise my nodes didn't allow the bitcoin port. I'll get
> right on it.
> Also, if anyone in the Tor community has spare capacity, you can
> also setup a full bitcoin node on the same server you use as an
> exit/relay/bridge and it doesn't take up a great deal of resources
> other than disk space (16Gb I think right now and growing slowly).
> On my series of exits there is also full bitcoin nodes accessible
> exclusively over hidden services and others which are accessible
> over regular clearnet.
> On 27/10/2014 19:58, grarpamp wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
>> <mle+tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Could this situation be improved if people ran limited exit
>>> nodes that only alloed the bitcoin p2p protocol to exit? I for
>>> one don't have enough
>> There are about ten exit nodes that do only this today. [One of
>> which is run by Mike Hearn who has advocated building in
>> censorship capabilities to Tor, and blocking (historically)
>> tainted coins (such as you have now or might receive through
>> otherwise completely innocent transactions with you, or from your
>> own trans/mixing with others).]
>> Then there is question if your client will select such 'only
>> *coin' nodes versus those with high bandwidth and open exit
>> There are also a fair number of hidden services in Tor/I2P/CJDNS
>> that act as bitcoin nodes.
>> As related tangent, yes, the bitcoin protocol needs to be
>> encrypted on the wire, at least bitcoin node to bitcoin node
>> with TLS, obviously and urgently so, particularly if you wish to
>> guard your trans from wire listeners.
>> You might be best to in fact run bitcoin always and entirely
>> over Tor, especially while transacting. But then also routinely
>> compare that received blockchain to one you receive via
>> alternate/trusted sources, such as clearnet or signed bittorrent
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to