Re: TOR Park Exit Node Question

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: TOR Park Exit Node Question

From: Matt Thorne <mlthorne@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:58:25 -0400

Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org

Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org

Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org

Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:58:41 -0400

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BQ61lFILoRuwd0x42yvtmvVqpifSi70wyH7MVMWB/2EDG7NW1MyEVxt1CEqtCFsJICizKIcNAh62q9XB7pDKFvhQavaeG8pifQG5r0xemz9qLlZvLhuxIxPjReWX683cnzPFcgEV3R7gXEUInN7Bw9xp2STMk/iYxXv6yjSTr84=

In-reply-to: <20050928214107.GA29315@deimos>

References: <092820051623.12011.433AC392000EA2BB00002EEB22058844849D0A900A9CD20A050703@comcast.net> <5c4c375e0509281215450e09a5@mail.gmail.com> <20050928214107.GA29315@deimos>

Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I created something like 10 circuts through torpark, one after the other, over the space of 5 minutes. the ip:

was the only exit that I connected to more than once, but that one only came up twice (and not in a row either) Since all of the other connections were all different, I have to assume that this server is just -= coincidentally=- getting alot of traffic from tor.

On 9/28/05, phobos@xxxxxxxxxx <phobos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Did anyone record which exit node it was? Or even better, their
entire circuit?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:15:22PM -0400, mlthorne@xxxxxxxxx wrote 2.0K bytes in 47 lines about:
: I hadn't noticed, but I am seeing the same thing. Personally I beleive it to
: be coincidence... Unless others have noticed this to be a growing trend tor
: wide? (as in not just in torpark?)
:
: On 9/28/05, mike.sever@xxxxxxxxxxx <mike.sever@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >
: > Having loaded and tested TORPARK on a USB it seems that both myself and
: > another person that I gave one to are having similar results. We are nearly
: > exclusively being routed out of an exit node in The Netherlands. I have
: > checked the TORRC file and cannot be see any reason why it would be giving
: > preferential treatment to the .nl exit router. Has anyone else had a similar
: > experience?
: >

--
phobos