Re: [INFO] new anonymizing software

[Paul Syverson <syverson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:11:29AM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:35:04AM +0200, bagelcat@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
> 
> Personally, my position on I2P is that I have no idea how secure its
> design is, since I haven't seen a protocol specification.  So far as I
> can tell, there isn't one.  This doesn't mean that the protocol is
> broken; just that I have no way of telling what the protocol actually
> *is* without reading the source and assuming everything the source
> does is intentional.
> 

In (approximately?) the words of Bob Morris, a system without a
specification cannot fail; it can only surprise you.

-Paul