[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
How anonymity software landscape will look
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: How anonymity software landscape will look
- From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:48:22 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:48:47 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=BmxleyJzuajNjM/E7XXhB1Sp6j8JZiwb5AbWE0HutzwrGPIyMphoHOWRQa80Iy0IsUXMTp3HQKi/FzrSUN6ELDexR4oMJDukCKcoaUcpCQrITmZ3iQy504hflfG+Gjq4j9spBLpsQQ84ONAI+6QTL36cIVTb0j6XRDH+6CNCkug=
- Openpgp: url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x57C89443
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909)
For content retrieval: Freenet/Gnunet.
For anonymous services: I2P(possibly)
For anonymous Internet: Tor
For anonymous email: Onion Routers
Each piece of software fills a niche in this hierarchy. Tor is the most
important as it lets people use existing applications anonymously. Sure,
Tor will have .onion forever, and I2P will have gateways to the
Internet, but they are optimized for different things. That's why we
can't just use one solution. Each one fills or will a different need.
-Watson Ladd
--
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security,
deserve neither liberty or security
--Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature