[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Exclude nodes from certain countries
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Exclude nodes from certain countries
- From: "Ringo Kamens" <2600denver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:47:56 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:48:05 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=0Hf+nw8vV92GW1OSJNBkrDNfh0DJnkRxZry728wScKI=; b=jCESBRpBoRRTRN2NJ6HBZg+iQ0I3IvLLcu2Mek/ACsaES+2O/pkRl/2Lr+VW0Cc/5uM3SMFvMcUNzi9o+zSe3XQPjDz+DDH8XH2JZeUcNuoaMPWvtdhjYkFlFjh122ysOTPDoB878U5a+gQrs/zanZ9hhvfls625WwNsT7fymzM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ENTdumvsXKRdynoPXg4QL3EvvgHxZfzGX1txcwceGgY9suU+8Ul9c+UxUXjtNZKa4h8/Q3dtbSqS3NPUIrzOxw7U37U1DvJd/A1WEjTO7E5lBRdly0M+PNtYdVbyIzfcVJhfz9K87f5BDlLnWChWdDjX6MpFGd9vNlpYqS4f/5A=
- In-reply-to: <fcegag$i21$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <fcegag$i21$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The best option is to run a squid server on localhost with a block by
country filter. Then, route your tor client through it.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 9/14/07, misc <misc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm using Tor on windows
>
> I prefer to avoid tor nodes from certain countries. I know that I can
> manually add nodes into ExcludeNodes setting in Tor Config.
>
> However there are over hundred different Tor nodes in one country I want to
> exclude. And they're constantly changing (news ones pop up, old ones
> disappear, etc). It's impossible to do such a task manually using
> ExcludeNodes setting.
>
> Didn't anybody find a better way?
>
>