[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:25:20 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:25:59 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LlbgJXm4PzthpwxVwy8QPLKJ9rVmoGvCt9MDbY3fgfA=; b=rYedsjqVnBPJxaLObqT9rUx4SODwJyDD9riWuYZ+j7GZNrF4U1ClnW5wThuIl3cbiP OAOPpGx6iM1z78uF0qtaapNyr52dhbtgFHBi52DgJDIt0Oc4uxLazEyhdmeE1f5iVRDl ytK84BFMJ71+mERFgB7WBHc9pDS5kdqNfDx0o=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=B7BNqiYDxHbf1vTzJgBOspDe6+hvc81meZcYJx5i2GZ/mm3ihHg3mYvMf+9jVQQESh m5yXRTjpjwsr9ksThht6oU7qn6qI/CGOjnetmERfkTaGajY+uNd06rn9T/EYES+jJtoa A8J62aoyuGqVsoVlKU23Hql1EZeqWNJwmxgBc=
In-reply-to: <20080904043647.GU15456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48A6DD45.1040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48AE8AA4.7000207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48BAB98D.40309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080904043647.GU15456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Supposedly, one of the exit node operators is going to try opening
465/587 where he hasn't done so before.

I'm all for opening 465/587 by default, but I also understand the
concern of exit operators that there may be a significant number of
(perhaps unknown?) sites running them in an insecure fashion.

I think an experimental approach could be greatly enlightening in this case.

- --
F. Fox
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com

Note 2008/08/19: I lost my old GPG keypair, and have generated a new
one. Authenticity can be verified by checking the ContactInfo on kitsune.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=U8it
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: phobos

References:
- Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: hijacking DNS server
Next by Author: Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
Previous by thread: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
Next by thread: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread