[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
From: Dawney Smith <dawneysmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:16:05 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:17:00 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J9Ch08sBoY8P+TAQDUdcNmntuQPxlldTh+jv7/bIEac=; b=gpay+rARQubmHRMFvEucbGdl8l8XdzVZISDPdYI6xiRjwiD7zwRyeEuAXq+eGb9jFY faAj3j3s/gOlXkAfh0huZQLY5DNnaK5wmQSySF4+6HoG4JIMyc4wIfdQJd7QUNkrEv9L NJNTuHvLvigYUZd0/gIQTQ8/hTeYISJq1hSa0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gQw+znMFMAgsVChnJwIbNyYe7qCTmnmVl2wVlDSbXSMnE7LcIa09Zfn76FQR9Yu6S6 g/z/UcVVVjkRVufOZpoLDzeJXLUf/kQBXwZtCZFZyUjywcCY/HGlxGIZYZbnJ7sr7Li9 WpNqPsa0siw2qIetayC/PweXitA8g+RUr8RS0=
In-reply-to: <20080904043647.GU15456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Openpgp: id=5D6281F2
References: <48A6DD45.1040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48AE8AA4.7000207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48BAB98D.40309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080904043647.GU15456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roger Dingledine wrote:

>>>> I know this has been discussed before, but I thought I'd bring it up
>>>> again. The following rules are in the default exit policy and I can't
>>>> see any reason why they would be:
>>>>
>>>> reject *:465
>>>> reject *:587
>> So is there going to be a change to the default Exit Policy?
> Thanks for sticking with this. I'm probably the closest person there is
> for changing the default exit policy. I confess I still haven't worked
> my way through all the off-topic garbage on or-talk from a few weeks ago.
> 
> Unfortunately, I'm not up on all the different ways that people screw up
> configuring their mail services these days. Back in 2005 when we first
> added 465 and 587 to the exit policies:
> http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Sep-2005/msg00090.html
> we did it because people showed up and explained that many sites were
> running services on those ports that were basically equivalent to what
> they run on port 25.
> 
> It sounds like nobody has any objections to opening these ports back up.
> And it sounds like it could help those folks using gmail, etc.
> 
> So I am inclined to do it.

Excellent. Thank you for taking the time to look into this Roger.

- --
Dawn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIwBfUcoR2aV1igfIRAroeAJ4iAjXBzh6YBdU3mWyrIX9Gt6LhtACfUgYT
VP1S3GZ5F9Ab4rPmwAv7goY=
=gaqi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: (micro)payments for anonymous routing in Tor?
Next by Author: Tor On Private Network
Previous by thread: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
Next by thread: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread