[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
From: "Jonathan Addington" <madjon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 21:28:29 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:28:35 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=SbnD7y+aGUozov836FpDmR62d7oTH7J7TCxAYF6QzF0=; b=SX0bQT42mDWGvLEQGBoflcVtHLx/eyaREU95NHRA5MA5mS6zBPuWPR3F1owK9RVDF1 Ij6uPrstKhgYyMp8ybzLmRr515zxLMLk5egeDbf2ZGMtZs9zPxvnMxFXKTOwkxXdwqzF e6+8RjuN6LVq55VXMx/0mrmg+VyFgn1iZcRUs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=FQvZnWAQOwgtEpqiXCV77pZLMXSfl+h35igQkIf9++Pv3PzFJtYSLrXtruSXCjbZvf YySW2CkWB3MsqyrKfne+/Qklxw9Ak5OWJCu0kziGL1nnaa9ZXjCeYpshSuD9zRfco6iM +h2zGUODOd1FZuz5mMg0AsEik8ns9ahFfnDM8=
In-reply-to: <48C47D49.3010405@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <21f144250809041520v7d67cc3fu1baec2f490600f79@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080906021435.GB3546@xxxxxxxxxx> <48C47D49.3010405@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:18 PM, F. Fox <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> After reading several articles on the fine-print of Chrome, I wouldn't
> touch it with a ten-parsec-pole, with or without Tor.

I had to at least try it out, it is kinda slick (you know, like most
things OS X ;-). The "application mode" or whatever its called is
handy (despite the fact that almost every other browser does the same
thing, they just call it full screen mode).

I do use Google services aside from Gmail in part because I have no
choice (Adwords) and in part because its handy (keeping everyone
coordinated on school projects with Google Docs for instance). For
such services why not use Chrome? I've already handed more over to
Google than I want, not sure what else they can gleam from me.

Just my random 2 cents.

> That's not even including the technical hurdles that would have to be
> overcome; given the amount of work given to making Firefox work right
> with Tor (Torbutton 1.2+), it'd be like reinventing the wheel, anyway.
>
> - --
> F. Fox
> Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
> http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJIxH02AAoJECxKjnsrYHNHLfYP/2hE7iUp7an85XgtTBwMLhHT
> A2il8j/XQnFxFdNaqpky1ai2BYpjR0n5Wu1IItXy4CxwZ7q46l2sChyJ3Js/EEQr
> dEwr7xfkQmFhHUlgjjDQPq5KMM4WKDAV14zFS+J/0kalKJeN9XCg0QQk3AJ6WQjb
> +iSi7+ldQysjvgjmtUyh2A7EDyGB+0KSBUkrILAa3xgy3eY8JuzOAmwHEH+uMm30
> fn9lxh0VgwmUZOPu9kRFpZ/niVxXzuQ2iUPswoJIsEQgt7owA6aUOP6MDk6N8ukq
> XaGIsaiFLWtHEsBwiNFZx+KHJWyd5eTwgX2V23fc8Hi+JjQrkaRRfC+dG6M6hIEd
> oNMZWJiHImkhytVG3cqoa7KcC6mm2vRL6lDZNy6lp1gW7XFwG7JufGhWWNaGUx+Y
> ZXd7QzW1t6WVCvUwv7Rv1czjKRqHo1hYamk74yvx+SLbqqFKykXdCOj6dcndRMC1
> gXT75KEZnuRtslCpeDTid3lRtBgGI7kTHrveOrFVaZVHDVWa2l9p4nzSwrJJXhzp
> dgvTRI7C0VRiL2vrtjoQFq3DZkQAqmaTNVPFQo6kUQbNLyjfv6ByOlTLx242DqM6
> y00LT4ZsU+oZ+nbxHhr7UaDLVhHnP/uMp2sibqQ3EYKfm1QJWlDfU5u6O7mkZyS0
> +vysmn+3Id1Vm+CQfmad
> =cCWt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
madjon@xxxxxxxxx

References:
- Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
  - From: Kyle Williams
- Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
  - From: Mike Perry
- Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
  - From: F. Fox

Prev by Author: Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
Next by Author: Re: Proposed student project
Previous by thread: Re: Google's Chrome Web Browser and Tor
Next by thread: Tor on Nokia Internet Tablet?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread