[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
From: "Aplin, Justin M" <jmaplin@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:50:36 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:50:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <4CA38336.8090105@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <4CA38336.8090105@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4

On 9/29/2010 2:19 PM, Matthew wrote:

I currently use Tor + Polipo + Torbutton + NoScript.

Obviously there are other add-ons for Firefox out there such as BetterPrivacy.

Are any other add-ons necessary or would people suggest I am now fully protected?

Thanks.

There is no such thing as being "Fully protected". Personally, as long as you don't have a three or four-letter agency after you, and are making SURE that all personally-identifiable information you enter is encrypted (under HTTPS or otherwise), I think you should be "protected enough" for most purposes.

~Justin Aplin

References:
- BetterPrivacy - necessary?
  - From: Matthew

Prev by Author: Re: A few questions and potential answers:
Next by Author: Re: Traffic question
Previous by thread: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
Next by thread: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread