[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] blutmagie exits shut down




On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:13 PM, "grarpamp" <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > Echoing...
> 
> Ditto. BM was an early, long running, high bandwidth and stable node.
> I don't think its importance to all the good packets that passed through
> it, and to Tor and the anonspace as a whole, can be underestimated.
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> 
 Thanks for your great contribution Olaf.
(@grarpamp: you mean 'I don't think .... should be underestimated' or
'..can be exaggerated'.)

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk