[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network

To: "tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:03:37 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:11:31 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0yPC5UNC67/9xAuwzUbPDzKeTy/3a//69WfN+n/v4ms=; b=ebi0rgceJfPUvfVIcOYRk/sueVdrUpLQrsMJbHeYwKzzQxKmvpu1Rqu5vSn17OHQ3f dtTFqNK6lDOxvDCvhVSPsd/3FHOR3jFexrkYF6s6Ayj5OEa2jp3FVqgPXJZmt5UtdWH9 o1SmPudy6pkSl8+mLhOhvhhZSlFM8PiUkS4LY+GpHaRFN2GeqZm4id5UTDcGM7et2PZG 9ulvV6qwGU2xUAjMUND3UW7ZBANqDcAawNFXDGZB9Klz8ADbpogsw8mfwXuCVu2GDUCX 2LInTFZNtEUV2M+lK2oqA1m43E5UVGjOVYbuDoEu5dohHdlxLFs/fLqQZUDbEE6IjrNL kFSw==
In-reply-to: <25537627.Kx7AdSvrcO@dragon>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20130906203518.GP29404@xxxxxxxxx> <CAKDKvuwtXDe4MoW1wbFSaZNOx7bHp7Q0JiQ2tpsShHJtbSjENQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <25537627.Kx7AdSvrcO@dragon>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand
<shieldfire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday, September 06, 2013 10:28:22 PM Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>>
>> Yup.  Please upgrade, people.  0.2.4 is looking pretty good right now,
>> and I'd recommend it strongly over 0.2.3 or a variety of reasons, not
>> limited to this.
>
> Would love to but yum only finds 0.2.3 as far as I understand =(

I don't install Tor from RPM myself, since I'm always building it from
source.  But would the alpha/development instructions at
https://www.torproject.org/docs/rpms.html.en help?

-- 
Nick
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
  - From: Benedikt Gollatz

References:
- [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
  - From: Martin Skjöldebrand

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] NIST approved crypto in Tor?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] NSA has cracked web encryption!
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] 1024 bit DH still common in Tor network
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread