[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Indirect Tor question
I like that idea. We need processer companies to stop owning their products
and to just let them go after we buy the product. It sucks being locked
into one solution...
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:15 PM, The Doctor <drwho@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 09/09/2013 05:27 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > Even coreboot helps you very little, as there is simply too much
> > proprietary crap in a typical PC platform where you can drop
> > undetectable (out of band) malware.
> For everyone who is sufficiently motivated to start working on this
> problem, the following archive will undoubtedly be interesting:
> - --
> The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
> Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/
> PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
> WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
> "You and the chief are the only ones in this section whose bodies
> don't come with a warranty."
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
If this email was not intended for you delete it and any copies you have of
it. The email was intended for "FirstName LastName". Information in this
email may be confidential and releasing it may be a violation of US law.
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to