> >> >Excuse my english... What I meant was storing the filenamesize in > >> >unsigned shorts rather than unsigned chars. > >Actually, do any OSes support names longer than 255 chars? I mean, > >paths, certainly, but names? I don't know... > > Not that I know of. <grepping /usr/src/linux/fs/*>. No, don't think so. > Then I think we shouldn't store filenamesizes in shorts. Stupid idea (of mine)...